Jeffrey M. Bradshaw compares Moses’ tabernacle and Noah’s ark, and then identifies the story of Noah as a temple related drama, drawing of temple mysticism and symbols. After examining structural similarities between ark and tabernacle and bringing into the discussion further information about the Mesopotamian flood story, he shows how Noah’s ark is a beginning of a new creation, pointing out the central point of Day One in the Noah story. When Noah leaves the ark, they find themselves in a garden, not unlike the Garden of Eden in the way the Bible speaks about it. A covenant is established in signs and tokens. Noah is the new Adam. This is then followed by a fall/Judgement scene story, even though it is Ham who is judged, not Noah. In accordance with mostly non-Mormon sources quoted, Bradshaw points out how Noah was not in “his” tent, but in the tent of the Shekhina, the presence of God, how being drunk was seen by the ancients as a synonym to “being caught up in a vision of God,” and how his “nakedness” was rather referring to garments God had made for Adam and Eve.
| Presented at: | The 2012 Temple on Mount Zion Conference Saturday, September 22, 2012 https://dev.interpreterfoundation.org/conferences/2012-the-temple-on-mount-zion-conference/ |
| Article Reprint: | “The Ark and the Tent: Temple Symbolism in the Story of Noah” Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship 44 (2021): 93-136 https://journal.interpreterfoundation.org/the-ark-and-the-tent-temple-symbolism-in-the-story-of-noah/ |
| Conference Proceedings: | Temple Insights at https://dev.interpreterfoundation.org/books/temple-insights/ |
Download PDF
Download audio recording
